Hmm.
I’ve been doing some simulations, and, discretion’n'valour and all that, I’ve provisionally decided to amend it so that this particular Jammer instance shows 4-5D rather than 3-5D.
Playing it as 3-5D had the power to be immensely destructive, but hard to handle (i.e. finding our best fit) if we’re in trouble. This suggests to me that a 3-5D treatment might work OK as a “bunny-bashing” device, but maybe not so hot against decent and organised opposition. I’ve always preferred to design my systems to face the latter category, hence the choice.
I am also conferring with SD as to whether there is any merit, in 4th seat in particular (and maybe even 3rd seat, though it would lose the above Jammer) as playing 2D as simply 11.0 to 16.8 6+D rather than 14.0 to 16.8 6+D good suit. This is because the 1D opening itself is now fairly nebulous in 3rd/4th seat. I am awaiting SD’s considered response on this one: it is normally worth the wait.
In the meantime, I’ll adjust the system page to reflect the amendment to the 3rd seat 2D opening.
Regards, DipBridge
