Dipbridge on Bridge Systems

October 7, 2008

DIP: Responses to 1D

Filed under: Bridge, DIP, Responses to 1D — dipbridge @ 12:44 pm

To my audience (small as it might well be), I’m sorry for the delay in getting this blog done.  It came from reviewing as to how best to use the “Pivot” I alluded to earlier, and in particular, how the overall raise structure may work.

What seems clear is that the first step, the R step, should be for powerful hands, where slam might be possible opposite the right opener, or for more moderate hands, without clear direction and/or something to show.  The 1NT “Pivot” should contain hands unsuitable for the above, which will usually mean they have a clear direction, and are probably not FG.

You had a flavour of what this might be in the previous blog, but here are the basic response to 1D(=H).

  • 1H:  R(elay), ART(ificial).  The kinds of hands included are likely to be from one of the following catgories:  (i) Slam Interest, or (ii) FG, but strain not clear, or (iii) INV, but strain not clear, or (iv) INV, with 3H, or (v) a hand that might bid 1NT if available in it’s natural sense.
  • 1S:  4+S, F1 (Forcing 1 Round), < INV (about 6 to 11 3/4 ppc)
  • 1NT:  “Pivot”:  A puppet to 2C.  Continuations to be fleshed out more fully, but will include (i) INV with 4-5H, and (ii) INV with a primary suit that isn’t H, and (iii) INV, 5+5+ not H, and probably (iv) a slightly stronger way to bid 2H than directly
  • 2C:  5+C, NNF, < INV
  • 2D:  5+D, NNF, < INV
  • 2H:  3H (sometimes 4H BAL), little if any game interest
  • 2S:  Fit-showing, NF, 6+S, usually only 3H
  • 2NT:  4+H, BAL INV or FG SPL
  • 3C:  Fit-showing, NF, 6+C, usually only 3H
  • 3D:  it-showing, NF, 6+D, usually only 3H
  • 3H:  4H (sometimes 5H BAL), little if any game interest
  • 3S: 4+H, REV TRF VOID (D) SPL
  • 3NT: 4H, BAL, FG
  • 4C: 4+H, REV TRF VOID (S) SPL
  • 4D:4+H, REV TRF VOID (C) SPL
  • Game:  to play

I expect the above to both (i) flesh out, and (ii) change – once it’s used a bit more in anger.  But, it gives a fair to good indication as to the direction DIP is heading in.

I’ll try to get the 1H response structure out a little more quickly, but it should be quite analagous to the above.

Regards, DipBridge

No Comments Yet »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.